Historical Record of the First, or Royal Regiment of Foot by Richard Cannon

(2 User reviews)   491
By Richard Stewart Posted on Mar 30, 2026
In Category - Early Readers
Cannon, Richard, 1779-1865 Cannon, Richard, 1779-1865
English
Okay, hear me out. This isn't your typical history book. It’s basically the official, Victorian-era personnel file for one of the oldest regiments in the British Army, the Royal Regiment of Foot. Imagine a meticulous clerk from the 1840s decided to write down everything—every battle from the 1600s to Waterloo, every colonel's name, every uniform change. The 'conflict' here isn't a plot twist; it's the relentless, grinding reality of war itself, recorded without sentiment. It's a dry list that somehow becomes haunting. You don't get heroes' speeches, you get numbers of men lost. The mystery is in reading between these stark lines: what was it *really* like for the men whose entire lives are summarized as 'present at the siege of Namur'? It's history stripped bare, and that makes it strangely powerful.
Share

Let's be clear from the start: Richard Cannon's Historical Record of the First, or Royal Regiment of Foot is not a novel. Don't come looking for a sweeping narrative or character arcs. Published in 1847, this book is a formal, regimental history commissioned by the British War Office. Cannon, a military clerk, compiled it from the official archives.

The Story

There's no plot in the traditional sense. The book is a chronological record. It starts with the regiment's raising in the 1600s and marches, year by year, through two centuries of European warfare. It lists the battles—the Boyne, Blenheim, Culloden, the American Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars. For each engagement, you get the basic facts: where it was, who commanded, and the brutal, unadorned casualty figures. Interspersed are details on changes in uniform, colonels-in-chief, and where the regiment was stationed. The 'story' is the relentless accumulation of these facts, painting a picture of an institution that endured through constant violence.

Why You Should Read It

The power of this book is in its stark, administrative tone. There's no glory, just record-keeping. When you read a line like 'Loss: 1 sergeant, 12 rank and file killed; 2 sergeants, 27 rank and file wounded,' the abstraction of war falls away. It forces you to imagine the individual men behind those numbers. It’s also a fascinating look at how the 19th-century military viewed its own history—as a lineage of service and sacrifice, meant to inspire the soldiers of Queen Victoria's era. You're not reading a historian's analysis; you're reading the raw material they would later use.

Final Verdict

This is a niche read, but a rewarding one. It's perfect for military history enthusiasts who want to go beyond popular summaries and see the primary framework of a regiment's life. It's also great for writers or researchers looking for authentic period detail on the British Army. If you need a gripping story, look elsewhere. But if you're fascinated by the gritty, factual skeleton of history, this is a compelling and oddly sobering document. Think of it as the ultimate, official biography of a fighting unit.

Paul Wright
1 year ago

I came across this while browsing and the clarity of the writing makes this accessible. One of the best books I've read this year.

Amanda Jackson
1 year ago

Not bad at all.

4.5
4.5 out of 5 (2 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.
You must log in to post a comment.
Log in

Related eBooks